USS Reuben James

October 31st, 2011

On 31 Oct 1941, USS Reuben James (DD-245)—a post-WWI four-funnel Clemson-class destroyer—was the first US Navy ship sunk by hostile action in WWII—this before the US entered the war.

Upon the outbreak of war in Europe in September 1939, she joined the Neutrality Patrol, and guarded the Atlantic and Caribbean approaches to the American coast. In March 1941, Reuben James joined the convoy escort force established to promote the safe arrival of materiel to the United Kingdom. This escort force guarded convoys as far as Iceland, after which they became the responsibility of British escorts.

Based in Iceland, she sailed on 23 October, with four other destroyers to escort an eastbound convoy. On 31 Oct she was torpedoed by U-552 near Iceland. Reuben James had positioned herself between an ammunition ship in the convoy and the known position of a “wolfpack”, a group of submarines that preyed on Allied shipping. Reuben James was hit forward by a torpedo and her entire bow was blown off when a magazine exploded. Of the 159-man crew, only 44 survived.

Escorting supply convoys to England was hardly a neutral act. President Roosevelt knew that the American public did not want to enter another of Europe’s wars, yet he did want to protect England. So Roosevelt created this totally phony idea of a “Neutrality Patrol” which was a violation of both international law and the trust of the American people. That she was sunk by a German sub while the US was still officially neutral ignores the fact that the ship was protecting supplies bound for England from German subs—an act of war. Her crew served honorably and well, doing their duty as ordered by the Commander in Chief. The president did not serve honorably and well—we should require honorable service from our presidents, don’t you think?

We’re leaving Iraq

October 29th, 2011

Each day the number of convoys leaving Iraq is growing as the political requirement that we withdraw approaches. In one sense, we have no option, as withdrawal by the end of this year was agreed upon at the political level. However, leaving before Iraq can truly defend itself against Iranian and other terrorist intervention does put the fruit of the valor and blood of our troops at serious risk. It’s worthy of note that President Obama did not so much as pick up the phone to talk with the Iraqi leadership to discuss their readiness to stand alone. My sad conclusion is that he wants the political plumb of saying he got us out more than he wants to protect the frail democracy that is Iraq.

Some in the media say that Americans are hated in Iraq and that they really want us out. That is partially true. At the official governmental and media levels they do want us gone so that they can say that they are standing alone and don’t need the rich Americans. However, below the national level, at the provincial and regional levels and in the streets the attitude is very much different. There, where the terrorists have killed and destroyed local people, the Iraqi citizens know that we are there to help them—not to occupy their nation. Those people truly don’t want us to leave.

That said, Oct. has been a busy month, as many of the individual military units are packing up and sending equipment back home. “More and more convoys of vehicles and equipment are being packed up and shipped out in preparation to exit Iraq,” said Staff Sgt. Erick Torres, convoy cmdr., 233rd Trans. Co, from Ala. Each truck carrying military vehicles. including High-Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicles, MRAP vehicles, and tanks is backed up to a ramp, and the vehicles are carefully loaded onto the flatbeds. “The most challenging part of this job is loading the vehicles,” said Torres.

Once the cargo is loaded onto the trucks and the paperwork is complete, the convoy is then lined up at a designated staging area to await departure. The US still has thousands of soldiers, and an abundance of equipment that need to be shipped home before the year’s end. Soldiers and civilian contractors work long hours to make sure equipment is packed properly and ready for transit.

“Part of being the convoy commander is identifying vehicles and equipment by serial number, and matching them against the unit rosters before they’re shipped,” said Torres. “It makes for long days, but it’s a necessary part of the process,” he said. “Each convoy is assigned a security team to escort the cargo from COB Adder to their final destination,” said Torres.

And so our military is faithful to its political leadership as they begin to Cut ‘n Run, leaving the battlefield to the enemy. This is very sad.

Episode 202

October 27th, 2011

Topics

News and Comment by the Col: Racism and the military
Catherine Herridge: On her book “The Next Wave”
Hamdi Rammal: Being a Muslim in America
Keith St Clair; ESGR; Last Thoughts

Listen to this episode:

Pulling out of Iraq

October 26th, 2011

The Prez says we’ll be totally out of Iraq by Christmas. That’s a bit dangerous, as Iran is in position and motivated to interfere in a major way, especially once we’re gone. Granted that Iraqi leaders have the decision, but both our President and our Vice President haven’t had any contact with Iraqi leaders in nearly a year. This is outrageous. http://www.jewishworldreview.com/1011/obama_too_busy_iraq.php3

Occupying Wall St & Oprah

October 25th, 2011

Okay, we’re not sure what the Occupy Wall St types are for, but they’re definitely against the huge salaries the top CEOs make. Maybe they’d like a law that puts a maximum amount of money anyone can make in a year. Once you hit that max you have to take the rest of the year off. I think a similar policy at IBM drove Ross Perot to start his own company.

So, that would also limit what the big movie stars and pro athletes would make. Maybe we could do that without a law. Imagine if every season ticket holder cancelled their season tickets and 90% of the movie goers stayed home; that could certainly impact the salaries and big time movie
contracts. Perhaps after a year or two, we might be able to take a family of four to see a game for less than $200 or see a movie for less than $40.

And I’m totally sure that CEOs of large corporations really do need $24-$87M every year in order to have a slightly more than modest home, upscale but modest cars, children attending good public schools, and a nice but modest summer home and vacation. On the other hand, they do create a lot of jobs for others—and turn out a profit for the stockholders (owners); that is what they are hired to do, you know.

Forbes’ Celebrity 100 list for 2010 says that Oprah Winfrey earned $290 million. Even if her makeup person or cameraman earned $100k, she earned thousands of times more than that. Is that fair? There are many other celebrities who make much more than their staff, including Tyler Perry ($130 million), Jerry Bruckheimer ($113 million), Lady Gaga ($90 million) and Howard Stern ($76 million). According to The Wall Street Journal Survey of CEO Compensation (November 2010), Gregory Maffei, CEO of Liberty Media, earned $87 million, Oracle’s Lawrence Ellison ($68 million) and rounding out the top 10 CEOs was McKesson’s John Hammergren, earning $24 million. It turns out that the top 10 CEOs have an average salary of $43 million, which pales in comparison with America’s top 10 celebrities, who earn an average salary of $100 million.

So, why is it that rich CEOs are demonized and not celebrities? It clearly is not about the amount of money they earn. If it were, the left would be targeting multimillionaire Hollywood and celebrities and sports stars, such as LeBron James ($48 million), Tiger Woods ($75 million) and Peyton Manning ($38 million). But there is no way that politicians would take on the likes of Oprah Winfrey, Lady Gaga and LeBron James. That means celebrities can make any amount of money they want and it’s fine. Are the only bad people the ones that create jobs for others?

So, what’s the issue? It’s the government. The Occupy crowd should join the Tea Party and throw all the big spenders out of DC. Any bets that they will?