The death of our Constitution

February 5th, 2012

On 5 Feb 1937, President Franklin Roosevelt proposed an increase in the size of the US Supreme Court—his ‘court packing’ proposal. It failed. However, this act ultimately succeeded in convincing the Justices to ignore the actual words in our Constitution—thus the US Constitution—that document that we military folks swear to support and defend–died.

Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution gives power to the US Congress—thus to the national government. Article I, Section 10 prohibits the states from certain actions. And the 10th Amendment to our Constitution provides that, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
Should the people of the nation decide to change the constitution, there was an amendment process, but it truly required the will of the majority of the citizens of the nation. No elite group or coalition of interests could do so. And our Constitution properly and well guided our nation for well over a century, until Franklin Roosevelt came along.

The great depression struck our nation with the Wall Street crash of Oct 1929. The more rural states were able to handle the unemployment, but the industrial states were having trouble. Democrat Roosevelt ran for president on a platform promising a New Deal—which meant a significant increase in power for the federal government, and specifically included it in welfare. He was elected and found himself with a Congress overwhelmingly of his party, too.

There were two schools of thought about the power of the federal government. The school of thought that had prevailed since the beginning of the nation was the “original intent” or the “formalist” camp. The competition called itself the realists. Realists argued that the constitution should be interpreted flexibly and judges should not use the Constitution to impede legislative experimentation. One of the most famous proponents of this concept, known as the Living Constitution, was Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., who said in Missouri v. Holland the “case before us must be considered in the light of our whole experience and not merely in that of what was said a hundred years ago.” This is now known as “judicial interpretation.”

Well, the court struck down a good number of Roosevelt’s bills because they violated the words that are written in the Constitution. Roosevelt was so unhappy with this that he noted that the Constitution provides that there will be a Supreme Court, but not how many justices there would be on it. So he proposed to add 8 more justices—all of whom would agree with him. The law, Court Packing, was introduced, but never made it through the senate. It appears that even if they were all Democrats, no one wanted to give the president that much power.

But the Court got the message. Just because the packing bill didn’t pass Congress this time, didn’t mean it wouldn’t later. So, guess what happened? The court suddenly found the New Deal bills to be constitutional. Effectively they just took the 10th Amendment to the Constitution and cut it out and threw it away.

We were once a Constitutional Republic; we are no longer as the words in the Constitution no longer have meaning. The Constitution is still the law of the land, but it means whatever the Supreme Court says it means. That’s how the Warren Court was able to find abortion in the Constitution; that’s how Obama’s folks found Obamacare there. And someday they may find that women have to wear burkas there. All this without having to go through the nasty process of amending the document. We need to return to the words of our Constitution.

Tet 68

January 30th, 2012

On 30 Jan 1968, during the agreed upon cease-fire during the Tet Holiday, in coordinated attacks all across South Vietnam, communist forces launched their largest offensive of the Vietnam War against South Vietnamese and US troops.

About 80,000 troops of the North Vietnamese Army and National Liberation Front attacked cities and military establishments throughout South Vietnam. The most spectacular episode occurred when a group of NLF commandos blasted through the wall surrounding the American embassy in Saigon in an unsuccessful attempt to seize the embassy. Most of the attacks were turned back, with the communist forces suffering heavy losses.

Battles continued to rage throughout the country for weeks–the fight to reclaim the city of Hue from communist troops was particularly destructive. I was a rifle company commander in the 101st Airborne Division, and I was very near Hue when the attack began. During the following weeks I experienced the most intense fighting of my career. American and South Vietnamese forces lost over 3,000 men during the offensive; the enemy, as high as 40,000.

While the communists did not succeed militarily, the impact of the Tet Offensive on public opinion in the US was significant. The American people, who had been told a few months earlier that the war was successful and that US troops might soon be allowed withdraw, were stunned to see fighting taking place on the grounds of the US embassy.

Within weeks the Communists were defeated everywhere; indeed, General Giap, the North Vietnamese commander, mentioned in his memoirs that he was ready to give up and go back to the north—but he was encouraged to stay in the war by — who else? The anti-American main-stream media in the US. American media called the Tet Offensive a great Communist victory; there were demonstrations and riots in the US—and Giap decided to stay in the war. A good decision for Giap as he ultimately won the war, thanks to our media.

Nuclear danger

January 25th, 2012

There are a lot of reasons why it’s in everyone’s best interest for most countries not to have nuclear weapons. This story is one example. On 25 Jan 1995, Russia’s early-warning defense radar detected an unexpected missile launch near Norway, and Russian military command estimates the missile to be only minutes from impact on Moscow. Moments later, Russian President Boris Yeltsin, his defense minister, and his chief of staff were informed of the missile launch. The nuclear command systems switched to combat mode, and the nuclear suitcases carried by Yeltsin and his top commander were activated for the first time in the history of the Soviet-made weapons system. Five minutes after the launch detection, Russian command determined that the missile’s impact point would be outside Russia’s borders. Three more minutes passed, and Yeltsin was informed that the launching was likely not part of a surprise nuclear strike by Western nuclear submarines.
These conclusions came minutes before Yeltsin and his commanders should have ordered a nuclear response based on standard launch on warning protocols. Later, it was revealed that the missile, launched from Spitzbergen, Norway, was actually carrying instruments for scientific measurements. Nine days before, Norway had notified 35 countries, including Russia, of the exact details of the planned launch. The Russian Defense Ministry had received Norway’s announcement but had neglected to inform the on-duty personnel at the early-warning center of the imminent launch. The event raised serious concerns about the quality of the former Soviet Union’s nuclear systems.

Pro-life or Pro-choice

January 23rd, 2012

On 22 Jan 1973, the US Supreme Court handed down the Roe vs Wade decision. Regardless of where you stand on the issue, I don’t see where this decision came from—it’s nowhere even hinted to in the about 7600 words of our Constitution—the Constitution that I swore to support and defend. Prior to Roe, abortion was illegal in 30 states, but the will of the people in those states was dismissed. But, let me make it clear at the start; I’m pro-life. I also respect the right of a woman to do as she wishes with her body. Here’s my thinking:

If you plant corn in a proper way, that kernel or seed eventually becomes a stalk of corn. It starts as corn and ends up as corn. It doesn’t become a rock, a turtle, or a banana while becoming a stalk or corn. When a man and a woman have intercourse and the result is a fertilized ovum that began as a sperm and an egg from two humans, and, if left alone, becomes a baby human. It’s human from the very start and remains human through birth until death. That human being began being human at conception; killing it is murder.

At the point of conception and until birth, sorry ladies, your body is not just your own. Your body is the place where another human being, with its own rights, lives. It may not be fair to you, but, then, life isn’t fair—and the word “fair” is nowhere in the Constitution.

Patriotism and our media

January 16th, 2012

On 16 Jan 1991, at midnight in Iraq, the UN deadline for the Iraqi withdrawal from Kuwait expired, and we prepared to commence offensive operations to forcibly eject Iraq from its 5-month occupation of its oil-rich neighbor. At 4:30 pm EST, the first fighter aircraft were launched from Saudi Arabia and off US and British aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf on bombing missions over Iraq. All evening, aircraft from the US-led military coalition pounded targets in and around Baghdad as the world watched the events transpire in television footage transmitted live via satellite from Baghdad and elsewhere. At 7:00 pm, Operation Desert Storm, the code-name for the massive US-led offensive against Iraq, was formally announced at the White House.

Shortly thereafter, all US media were forced to leave Iraq; they were there reporting the attacks from their hotels. When they returned our intelligence folks wanted to debrief them. Our fine American, patriotic journalists refused to provide our nation with any insights they had from time in the enemy capital. Their primary allegiance, they said, was to their journalistic integrity–not to any country; it was fine with them that American soldiers might die because they withheld information. We simply can not trust the values of our main-stream media.